Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
2.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263502, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1706351

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, nurses stand in an unknown situation while facing continuous news feeds. Social media is a ubiquitous tool to gain and share reliable knowledge and experiences regarding COVID-19. The article aims to explore how nurses use social media in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: A scoping review inspired by Arksey and O'Mally was conducted by searches in Medline, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete and Web of Sciences. Empirical research studies investigating nurses' use of social media in relation to COVID-19 were included. Exclusion criteria were: Literature reviews, articles in languages other than English, articles about E-health, and articles investigating healthcare professionals without specification of nurses included. Articles, published in January-November 2020, were included and analysed through a thematic analysis. The PRISMA-ScR checklist was used. RESULTS: Most of the eleven included studies were cross-sectional surveys, conducted in developing countries, and had neither social media nor nurses as their main focus of interest. Three themes were identified: 'Social media as a knowledge node', 'Social media functioned as profession-promoting channels' and 'Social media as a disciplinary tool'. Nurses used social media as channels to gain and share information about COVID-19, and to support each other by highlighting the need for training and changes in delivery of care and redeployment. Further, social media functioned as profession-promoting channels partly sharing heroic self-representations and acknowledgment of frontline persons in the pandemic, partly by displaying critical working conditions. Finally, nurses used social media to educate people to perform the 'right 'COVID-19' behaviours in society. CONCLUSION: This review provided snapshots of nurses' uses of social media from various regions in the world, but revealed a need for studies from further countries and continents. The study calls for further multi-methodological and in depth qualitative research, including theoretically framed studies, with a specific focus on the uses of social media among nurses during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Social Media/statistics & numerical data , Social Support/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Information Dissemination , Nurses/psychology , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Professional Role/psychology , Social Support/psychology
4.
J Contin Educ Nurs ; 52(6): 294-300, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1248070

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The global COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented challenges to the health care workforce. Little is known about the effect of the pandemic on new RNs and their preparedness for such a crisis. This study explored the lived experiences of RNs transitioning from students to professionals during the pandemic. METHOD: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 new RNs working in acute care facilities during the Maryland COVID-19 State of Emergency. RESULTS: Three themes were identified to describe the experiences of new nurses transitioning to practice in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: uncertainty, vulnerability, and resilience. CONCLUSION: New nurses need greater support during transition to practice. Initiatives to improve trusting relationships between new nurses and their organizations and support of the development of essential relationships (e.g., peers, frontline management, and educators) could enhance new nurses' resilience and commitment to stay with the organization. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2021;52(6):294-300.].


Subject(s)
COVID-19/nursing , Clinical Competence , Critical Care Nursing , Nurse's Role/psychology , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Professional Role/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Maryland , Pandemics , Qualitative Research , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
6.
Przegl Epidemiol ; 74(4): 620-633, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1190770

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has proved that community pharmacies play a pivotal role in providing medicines, information and safety measures to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2. PURPOSE: The study aimed to get to know opinions of pharmacy staff and owners on the functioning of the community pharmacy during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To collect opinions about functioning of the community pharmacy during the pandemic, we conducted cross-sectional study among pharmacy staff and owners of pharmacies. RESULTS: The study group included 456 respondents mostly associated with independent pharmacies (55.7%), from cities less than 100,000 inhabitants (38.8%). The number of patients as well as filled prescriptions increased during the pandemic. Respondents provided patients with advice on cold (81.6%), sore throat (77.0%) and acherelated complaints (68.6%). Most of participants (64.5%) declared that they informed patients about COVID-19. The safety measures in community pharmacies included: a safety regulations poster during the pandemic (97.1%), handwashing in accordance with recommended guidelines (96.3%) and using protective gloves by the pharmacy staff (89.9%). According to 60.7% of participants, the community pharmacy was properly prepared for the pandemic by the owner, however, respondents from independent pharmacies indicate this more frequently (p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Respondents are aware of the role of community pharmacies in the healthcare system during the pandemic, nevertheless, more attention needs to be paid by public authorities and governmental institutions to patient safety in the community pharmacy.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , COVID-19/prevention & control , Community Pharmacy Services/organization & administration , Pharmacists/psychology , Professional Role/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Education as Topic , Pharmacists/statistics & numerical data , Poland , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 21(1): 304, 2021 Apr 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1169961

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rapid spread of COVID-19 forced the public to turn to community pharmacies as the most accessible points of primary healthcare, overloading pharmacy services. The objectives of this research were to detect and describe the changes in work environment of community pharmacists in Vojvodina during the state of emergency due to COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic effects on job related stress were assessed. METHODS: Community pharmacists from Vojvodina completed an online questionnaire on work environment changes related to COVID-19 (cross-sectional study). RESULTS: Out of the 1574 licenced pharmacists in Vojvodina, 392 completed the survey. Workload increase, reported by 90.8% of pharmacists, was caused mostly by higher demand for safety equipment, antiseptics and disinfectants, dietary products and medicines. Most pharmacists (93.1%) considered pharmacy workflow to be more complex than before the pandemic. Clients' behavior was described as less pleasant since the start of the pandemic by 67.6% of the community pharmacists. Many were concerned for their health and the health of their families (68.9%). Community pharmacists rated their stress levels higher if they i) were working in larger chains, ii) experienced clients' behavior as less pleasant or/and iii) were concerned for their/their family health. CONCLUSIONS: Current research pointed out the need for a more robust healthcare system which would allow rapid introduction of new activities and roles for community pharmacists that could possibly decrease job-related stress. Legal steps to improve the work environment in community pharmacies are necessary and urgent in order to fully utilize their skills and knowledge.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , COVID-19/psychology , Community Pharmacy Services , Pharmacists/psychology , Professional Role/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pharmacies , SARS-CoV-2 , Serbia/epidemiology
8.
Respir Res ; 22(1): 88, 2021 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1143219

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ehealth platforms, since the outbreak of COVID-19 more important than ever, can support self-management in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The aim of this observational study is to explore the impact of healthcare professional involvement on the adherence of patients to an eHealth platform. We evaluated the usage of an eHealth platform by patients who used the platform individually compared with patients in a blended setting, where healthcare professionals were involved. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, log data from September 2011 until January 2018 were extracted from the eHealth platform Curavista. Patients with COPD who completed at least one Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) were included for analyses (n = 299). In 57% (n = 171) of the patients, the eHealth platform was used in a blended setting, either in hospital (n = 128) or primary care (n = 29). To compare usage of the platform between patients who used the platform independently or with a healthcare professional, we applied propensity score matching and performed adjusted Poisson regression analysis on CCQ-submission rate. RESULTS: Using the eHealth platform in a blended setting was associated with a 3.25 higher CCQ-submission rate compared to patients using the eHealth platform independently. Within the blended setting, the CCQ-submission rate was 1.83 higher in the hospital care group than in the primary care group. CONCLUSION: It is shown that COPD patients used the platform more frequently in a blended care setting compared to patients who used the eHealth platform independently, adjusted for age, sex and disease burden. Blended care seems essential for adherence to eHealth programs in COPD, which in turn may improve self-management.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Health Personnel/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Professional Role/psychology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/psychology , Telemedicine/methods , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Retrospective Studies
9.
Acad Med ; 96(7): 964-966, 2021 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1140014

ABSTRACT

As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic hit the United States in March 2020, there was widespread disruption of clinical medical education: Hospital clerkships were suspended nationwide and students were moved out of the hospital and continued their studies remotely through virtual learning systems. Frustrated by not being able to directly care for patients, medical students across the country formed diverse volunteer initiatives to help frontline clinicians. In this article, the authors describe the essential role of medical students at Weill Cornell Medicine in quickly designing and building a large registry of COVID-19 patients who presented at 3 New York City hospitals. The Cornell COVID-19 Registry, which contains granular clinical information on more than 4,000 patients, informed hospital operations and guided clinical management during the first wave of the pandemic. One month after its creation, the registry led to the first published description of the clinical characteristics of a U.S.-based cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Using their experience as a model, the authors propose that students who cannot participate in their clinical clerkships because of the pandemic can augment their traditional medical education by contributing to COVID-19 research. In the case described in this article, students reviewed the management of COVID-19 patients, followed inpatients throughout their hospitalization (much like students would on clinical rotations), and refined their interpersonal skills through discussions with patients and patients' families during follow-up calls. The authors conclude that medical students who are displaced from their hospital rotations can further their education and provide an invaluable contribution to the fight against COVID-19 by serving as essential frontline researchers.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Professional Role , Registries , Students, Medical , Biomedical Research/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Education, Distance/methods , Education, Distance/organization & administration , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/organization & administration , Humans , Leadership , New York City/epidemiology , Pandemics , Professional Role/psychology , Students, Medical/psychology , Volunteers/psychology
11.
BMJ Open ; 11(1): e042591, 2021 01 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1054682

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To measure work-related burnout in all groups of health service staff during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify factors associated with work-related burnout. DESIGN: Cross-sectional staff survey. SETTING: All staff grades and types across primary and secondary care in a single National Health Service organisation. PARTICIPANTS: 257 staff members completed the survey, 251 had a work-related burnout score and 239 records were used in the regression analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Work-related burnout as measured by the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory; (2) factors associated with work-related burnout identified through a multiple linear regression model; and (3) factors associated with work-related burnout identified through thematic analysis of free text responses. RESULTS: After adjusting for other covariates (including age, sex, job, being able to take breaks and COVID-19 knowledge), we observed meaningful changes in work-related burnout associated with having different COVID-19 roles (p=0.03), differences in the ability to rest and recover during breaks (p<0.01) and having personal protective equipment concerns (p=0.04). Thematic analysis of the free text comments also linked burnout to changes in workload and responsibility and to a lack of control through redeployment and working patterns. Reduction in non-COVID-19 services has resulted in some members of staff feeling underutilised, with feelings of inequality in workload. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses support anecdotal reports of staff struggling with the additional pressures brought on by COVID-19. All three of the factors we found to be associated with work-related burnout are modifiable and hence their effects can be mitigated. When we next find ourselves in extraordinary times the ordinary considerations of rest and protection and monitoring of the impact of new roles will be more important than ever.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Health Personnel/psychology , Professional Role/psychology , Workload/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Rest/psychology , SARS-CoV-2 , State Medicine , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
13.
J Pastoral Care Counsel ; 74(4): 258-264, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-968978

ABSTRACT

Shifts in chaplain requests from patients and families and lack of engagement by staff in now traditional support forms in the COVID-19 context suggest that new insights and resourcing are needed. This exploratory translational study suggests that the evolutionary psychology of R. I. M. Dunbar and the social neuroscience of J. T. Cacioppo, his collaborators, and successors and their concerns for human loneliness have potential for use in development of effective healthcare chaplaincy practice in the COVID-19 context.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Clergy/psychology , Loneliness/psychology , Pastoral Care/methods , Professional Role/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Object Attachment , Spirituality
15.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 61(4): 805-811, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-807897

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a dramatic impact on palliative care delivery and patient experiences. Less is known about the experiences and responses of palliative care clinicians. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the pandemic's impact on pediatric palliative care clinicians' personal and professional well-being. METHODS: The Palliative Assessment of Needed DEvelopments & Modifications In the Era of Coronavirus (PANDEMIC) cross-sectional online survey was posted on 7 professional listservs between May and June 2020. We conducted a conventional content analysis of written responses to three open-ended questions regarding the lasting impact of COVID-19. RESULTS: Of 207 multidisciplinary respondents from 80 US cities, 148 (71%) provided written responses to open-ended questions, and 62 responses (42%) were related to personal, professional, or existential well-being. These responses were sorted into 4 major categories: personal burdens, professional burdens, personal benefits, and professional benefits. Respondents described burdens more commonly than they did benefits (67% vs. 33% of comments, respectively). Personal burdens related to increased fear and uncertainty, fear of bringing the virus home, and a sense of collective grief. Professional burdens included a sense of exhaustion, a challenge with work-life balance, personal experiences with colleagues infected with the virus, and considerations of leaving health care altogether. Personal benefits included lessons learned, an evolving sense of what matters, and improved work-life balance. Professional benefits included opportunities for professional development and a sense of professional purpose. CONCLUSION: Pediatric palliative care clinicians perceive a breadth of impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic. Ongoing clinician assessment is important as the pandemic continues.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Fear/psychology , Health Personnel/psychology , Occupational Stress/epidemiology , Palliative Care , Pediatrics , COVID-19/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Grief , Humans , Professional Role/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uncertainty , United States
16.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci ; 76(4): e219-e224, 2021 03 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-733380

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Social work has a long history of responding to the needs of vulnerable populations during times of crisis and disaster. Social workers are working at the front lines responding to the current COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of health care practice settings, including nursing homes; however, it is unclear how social workers perceive their preparedness during this time. METHODS: This study employed a cross-sectional survey to nursing home social workers via social media on feelings of preparedness for COVID-19, what has been most professionally helpful for social workers during these times in their role in COVID-19, as well as demographic questions. Demographic data were analyzed using SPSS and qualitative data were analyzed using the rigorous and accelerated data reduction technique. RESULTS: Data are based on a sample of 63 (N = 63) nursing home social workers. Findings revealed that while some social workers felt prepared for the coronavirus, many respondents stated that they were unprepared to meet the demands and challenges they were facing. Moreover, participants shared that professional support was critically important to get through COVID-19. DISCUSSION: These findings are important, as social workers are tasked with ensuring each resident attains their highest level of psychosocial well-being, which can be achieved only when nursing home staff are supported. Findings from the present study suggest that additional support for nursing home staff ought to include peer mentoring and mutual support. Additionally, improved leadership across health care settings is worth assessing.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Nursing Homes/organization & administration , Professional Role/psychology , Social Perception , Social Work/statistics & numerical data , Social Workers/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Aged , COVID-19/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Social Workers/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors
17.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci ; 51(4): 528-530, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-726646

ABSTRACT

The value of professional identity is an interesting territory to explore, relative to working in interprofessional teams and collaborative communities The collaborative opportunities provided to health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic is a rare opportunity to underscore the silent yet significant identity of radiologic technologists as professionals. Historically and prior to the pandemic, the role of radiologic technologists remains unfamiliar, if not unrecognized in the Philippine healthcare industry. The 'alliedness' of this health care professional group is an evolving entity that can no longer be overlooked. The central and indispensable role played by radiologic technologists (RTs) invites meaningful discussion and debate among peers and researchers, to better describe the professional identity and role of the RT as an indispensable member of the interprofessional team. Specific recommendations are offered to improve recognition of RTs and their professional identity within the healthcare system.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Personnel/psychology , Interprofessional Relations , Professional Role/psychology , Radiology/methods , Social Identification , Humans , Patient Care Team , Philippines
19.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 17(1): 1950-1953, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-245652

ABSTRACT

As the world edges towards relaxing the lockdown measures taken to control the spread of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), governments have started putting in place a variety of measures to avoid a second peak in the number of infections. The implementation of and adherence to such measures will be key components of any successful lockdown exit strategy. Ranging from expanded testing and widespread use of technology to building the public's trust in the post COVID-19 world, there is a role for pharmacists to play. In this commentary, these measures and the potential contribution of pharmacists to their successful implementation are outlined and discussed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Pharmacists/standards , Professional Role , Quarantine/standards , Humans , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Pharmacists/psychology , Professional Role/psychology , Quarantine/methods , Quarantine/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL